Monday, January 6, 2014

Myanmar's Move Forward


 “In a recent speech to the Burmese Chamber of Commerce, Thakin Nu, the Prime Minister, for the first time declared that foreign business had its part to play in Burma’s economic life and that the government was anxious to encourage individual as well as state-owned enterprise.”
                                         
                                                            The Economist, January 8th, 1949.
“We must turn to national industrialization to transform the country into a developed, rich one with a lot of employment opportunities and high per capita income… We have to ensure a proper market economy designed to reduce the economic gap between the rich and the poor and the development gap between urban and rural areas.”
Thein Sein, President of Myanmar, Inaugural Address, March 30th, 2011.
Despite the best intentions of former Prime Minister Thakin Nu, few countries in the world have developed less than Myanmar since 1949. By the end of military rule in 2011, Myanmar found itself considerably behind its ASEAN neighbours. To put this in context: in 1965, it had GDP per capita which was twice that of Thailand and three times that of Indonesia. Now, it has the lowest GDP per capita in Southeast Asia[i]. The country is the only ASEAN nation not to even feature on the World Bank’s Doing Business Report for 2013. But the reformist zeal of current President Thein Sein combined with trade sanctions being lifted by the United States and Europe mean that the next five years have the potential to bring more progress than the last 65. No other ASEAN nation can legitimately make such a claim.

Myanmar: Nothing this beautiful could be all that bad.
Its low starting base effectively means that what would amount to incremental changes in other ASEAN nations will amount to significant progress for Myanmar. Myanmar’s location at the crossroads of Asia also means that it is of strategic interest to many parties. President Obama’s visit in November 2012 – the first ever by a US President – is sufficient indication of that. Situated between India and China, Myanmar is ideally located in what will become the world’s economic heartland in the 21st century. By the early 2020’s, it is estimated that Asia will have a greater GDP than Europe and North America combined[ii]. With India and China providing the bulk of this economic activity (and a highway in Myanmar which links them already in the early stages of development[iii]), Myanmar is set to benefit from sharing borders with global business hubs. And as these economies begin to mature, Myanmar can provide higher growth opportunities for investors. For that to happen however, large-scale change is required in its business environment.
Since Thein Sein’s as President in 2011, government reforms have given cause for cautious optimism. At the forefront of these is the Foreign Investment Law passed by Parliament in November 2012, a document that creates a structured framework in which foreign companies can invest in Myanmar. Most important, it provides guarantees about investment protection and property rights[iv]. Foreigners can now own 100% of an enterprise based in Myanmar in “non-restricted” sectors, where previously the limit was set at 35%. Foreign investors will also be entitled to a five-year income tax holiday as well as a broad range of other reliefs and tax incentives aimed at encouraging new investment. Foreign investors will also be able to lease land from citizens or the state for up to 50 years, effectively knocking a major obstacle to any foreign firms looking to set up factories in Myanmar.
Infrastructure Development
Infrastructure in Myanmar will undergo massive improvements in the next five years. Take transport infrastructure as an example. Myanmar is the only member of ASEAN which is unconnected to any other country by railroad or highway. It has a road density of about 2km per 1,000 people, compared to an average of 11km in ASEAN overall[v]. However, in August of 2012, India provided loans of $500 million to complete its part of a trilateral highway between running between India, Myanmar and Thailand[vi]. In addition, Myanmar will gain its first deep-sea port at Kyaukpyu, which is almost complete, providing the shortest trade-route linking China and the Mekong Basin to India and the Middle East[vii]. A second is planned at Dawei as part of a special economic zone with multiple transport links to ASEAN neighbours[viii] and a third[ix] is already underway in Sittwe as part of an Indian joint-venture which will link India’s north-east with Myanmar’s south west.
Other infrastructure in Myanmar is similarly lagging behind its ASEAN neighbours but will make great strides in the coming five years. With mobile phone penetration of less than 10%, Myanmar is thought to be the second least connected nation in the world after North Korea[x]. The next lowest penetration among ASEAN nations is Laos with slightly over 20%. Compare these with markets like Cambodia and Thailand with 70% and 110% respectively. On January 25th 2013, the Burmese government received expressions of interest to develop the country’s mobile telecommunications infrastructure[xi]. The licences will be distributed in June 2013 and U Kyaw Soe, the head of Myanmar Post and Telecommunication expects penetration of 75% in four years[xii] – effectively a 7-8 fold increase. The knock-on benefits for small and medium-sized businesses should be immense.
A report released by the Asian Development Bank in August 2012 portrayed a dismal picture of Myanmar’s electricity network[xiii]. Only 26% of its population had access to electricity in 2011, compared with 100% in Malaysia, 80% in Laos and over 90% in the Philippines and Vietnam. Electricity is essential in a productive business environment. The Harvard Kennedy School terms it, “the missing prerequisite for development[xiv],” and the country’s leaders and the World Bank prioritized its development in a 3-day summit in Yangon at the beginning of February[xv]. The World Bank has committed $165 million in zero-interest loans for such priority needs. Norway are also assisting Myanmar with drafting new electricity legislation[xvi], the aim of which will allow private sector participation in power generation ,promote off-grid electrification and establish a regulator in line with international best practises. It is expected to be completed by June 2014.
Credit Availability
The financial landscape for business is also slowly changing. Since January 2013, foreign debit and credit cards have been accepted by Myanmar’s bank network[xvii], allowing foreigners increased access to local currency (which itself was moved to a managed exchange-rate on April 1st, 2012)[xviii]. The country’s first ever point-of-sale transaction occurred in February 2013[xix], representing a major inflection point for any business environment. Elsewhere, the IFC has invested $2 million in ACLEDA bank in order to help establish a new microfinance institution in Myanmar, the ultimate goal of which is to provide more than 200,000 loans to small businesses before 2020[xx]. The effect microfinance institutions have had in other poorly developed countries has been phenomenal. As of January 2013, Myanmar is the only ASEAN nation where microfinance has yet to be introduced. Its arrival means that even the poorest Burmese citizens will have some access to credit.
Higher up the business scale, at the end of 2012, the government approached 22 local firms about the possibility of listing on a revamped stock exchange planned for 2015[xxi]. This could signal the very early beginnings of capital markets in Myanmar. Although still early days, a local stock market has the potential to provide these firms with cheaper access to capital, increase their financing opportunities and hopefully, incentivize them to adopt better corporate governance. With so many vested interests in large Myanmar companies such as the Myanmar Economic Corporation (MEC) or the Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings (UMEH), a stock market could provide at least two benefits which will be key to Myanmar’s future prosperity: tying these vested interests to political and economic stability and forcing their hand to increase productivity and transparency within the firms.
Conclusion
As the quotations at the beginning of this article show, Myanmar has been at a similar juncture before. The story of reform in Myanmar is a seductive one, but not easily achieved. There are still major hurdles to overcome in terms of corruption and efficiency. A business culture isn’t created as soon as sanctions are dropped. However, the fact that Thein Sein is aiming for Myanmar to leave its status as a “Least Developed Country,” behind shows that at least achievable targets are being set. Aung Thura, CEO of ThuraSwiss, a consultancy in Myanmar notes[xxii]: “There are very high expectations in the general public. However, we need to realistically assess the economic development of the country. Implementation is also problematic. Although the reforms look good on paper, time and again, we have seen that implementation is paramount.” Those reforms deserve implementation. Now is Myanmar’s time to move forward.




[i] http://blogs.wsj.com/searealtime/2012/08/20/myanmars-growing-but-has-a-long-way-to-go/
[ii] http://www.economist.com/news/asia/21570729-australia-still-does-not-seem-entirely-sure-where-it-edge
[iii] http://inchincloser.com/2011/01/14/china-india-myanmar-construct-the-stilwell-road-to-boost-regional-trade/
[iv] http://www.pwc.com/sg/en/assets/document/myanmar_business_guide.pdf
[v] Myanmar Transport Sector Initial Assessment, Asian Development Bank, October 2012.
[vi] http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-08-13/india/33181793_1_trilateral-highway-thein-sein-india-asean
[vii] http://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2012/07/investing-myanmar
[viii] http://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2012/07/investing-myanmar
[ix] http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/27/us-myanmar-india-idUSBRE84Q00620120527
[x] http://in.mobile.reuters.com/article/idINBRE88C03K20120913?irpc=932
[xi] http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/3ade6302-5ef8-11e2-9f18-00144feab49a.html#axzz2K7HETAFu
[xii] http://www.economist.com/blogs/banyan/2012/07/investing-myanmar
[xiii] http://www.adb.org/documents/myanmar-energy-sector-initial-assessment
[xiv] http://www.ash.harvard.edu/extension/ash/docs/electricity.pdf
[xv] http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2013/02/05/World-Bank-Group-to-Support-Myanmar-8217-s-Plan-to-Improve-People-8217-s-Access-to-Electricity?cid=EXT_LinkedinWorldBank_P_EXT
[xvi] http://www.adb.org/news/adb-norway-help-update-myanmar-electricity-law
[xvii] http://www.nationmultimedia.com/business/Myanmar-banks-join-Visa-ATM-network-30196850.html
[xviii] http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2013/cr1313.pdf
[xix] http://blogs.wsj.com/searealtime/2013/02/01/getting-credit-in-myanmar/
[xx] http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2013/02/05/World-Bank-Group-to-Support-Myanmar-8217-s-Plan-to-Improve-People-8217-s-Access-to-Electricity
[xxi] http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304870304577489544120654560.html
[xxii] Aung Thura, in an interview given to the author; 23/01/2013. 

No comments:

Post a Comment